Relative difference contest success function
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2353585
Recommendations
Cites work
- Contest success functions
- Difference-form contests and the robustness of all-pay auctions
- Effort maximization in asymmetric contest games with heterogeneous contestants
- Equilibria in rent-seeking contests with homogeneous success functions
- The all-pay auction with complete information
- The theory of contests: a survey
- Tullock and Hirshleifer: a meeting of the minds
Cited in
(13)- Centralized vs decentralized contests
- Linking individual and collective contests through noise level and sharing rules
- Strategic rivalry for market share: a contest theory approach to dynamic advertising competition
- Properties of contests: constructing contest success functions from best-responses
- Foundations for contest success functions
- Centralized versus decentralized contests with risk-averse players
- Complete rent dissipation in contest with power technologies
- Optimal tie-breaking rules
- Equilibrium effort in games with homogeneous production functions and homogeneous valuation
- The interaction of emotions and cost-shifting rules in civil litigation
- Complete-rent-dissipation contest design
- Contest divisioning
- The power of passivity in the Hirshleifer contest under small noise
This page was built for publication: Relative difference contest success function
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2353585)