A truth serum for non-Bayesians: correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes
From MaRDI portal
Publication:3655348
DOI10.1111/J.1467-937X.2009.00557.XzbMATH Open1187.91060OpenAlexW2151389603MaRDI QIDQ3655348FDOQ3655348
Authors: Theo Offerman, Joep Sonnemans, Gijs van de Kuilen, Peter P. Wakker 
Publication date: 7 January 2010
Published in: Review of Economic Studies (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2009.00557.x
Recommendations
Cited In (34)
- An incentive compatible scoring rule for ordinal judgments of expected utility maximizers
- In search of good probability assessors: an experimental comparison of elicitation rules for confidence judgments
- Incentive contracts and strictly proper scoring rules.
- On the Road to Making Science of “Art”: Risk Bias in Market Scoring Rules
- \textit{Put your money where your forecast is}: supply chain collaborative forecasting with cost-function-based prediction markets
- Introduction to the special issue in honor of Peter Wakker
- Incomplete risk attitudes and random choice behavior: an elicitation mechanism
- Voluntary leadership and asymmetric endowments in the investment game
- Use of data on planned contributions and stated beliefs in the measurement of social preferences
- A note on proper scoring rules and risk aversion
- Measuring Beliefs Under Ambiguity
- Belief formation in a signaling game without common prior: an experiment
- Fragility of information cascades: an experimental study using elicited beliefs
- Convergence within binary market scoring rules
- Belief elicitation in experiments: Is there a hedging problem?
- Eliciting private information with noise: the case of randomized response
- Identification of non-equilibrium beliefs in games of incomplete information using experimental data
- Proper scoring rules with general preferences: a dual characterization of optimal reports
- Probabilism, entropies and strictly proper scoring rules
- Measuring and adjusting for overconfidence
- Further results on inquiry and truth possession
- Comonotonic proper scoring rules to measure ambiguity and subjective beliefs
- Experiments with the traveler's dilemma: welfare, strategic choice and implicit collusion
- How does communication affect beliefs in one-shot games with complete information?
- Experience in public goods experiments
- The uniqueness of local proper scoring rules: the logarithmic family
- Tailored Scoring Rules for Probabilities
- The value of a probability forecast from portfolio theory
- Towards a general class of parametric probability weighting functions
- Auctions with external incentives: experimental evidence
- Incentive-Compatible Surveys via Posterior Probabilities
- Proper scoring rules for general decision models
- Accounting for noise in the microfoundations of information aggregation
- An Overview of Applications of Proper Scoring Rules
This page was built for publication: A truth serum for non-Bayesians: correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3655348)
