A truth serum for non-Bayesians: correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:3655348)
Recommendations
Cited in
(38)- Voluntary leadership and asymmetric endowments in the investment game
- How does communication affect beliefs in one-shot games with complete information?
- Eliciting private information with noise: the case of randomized response
- Further results on inquiry and truth possession
- Incentive contracts and strictly proper scoring rules.
- A note on proper scoring rules and risk aversion
- Use of data on planned contributions and stated beliefs in the measurement of social preferences
- Auctions with external incentives: experimental evidence
- \textit{Put your money where your forecast is}: supply chain collaborative forecasting with cost-function-based prediction markets
- Introduction to the special issue in honor of Peter Wakker
- Incomplete risk attitudes and random choice behavior: an elicitation mechanism
- Towards a general class of parametric probability weighting functions
- Proper scoring rules with general preferences: a dual characterization of optimal reports
- The uniqueness of local proper scoring rules: the logarithmic family
- Convergence within binary market scoring rules
- Measuring and adjusting for overconfidence
- The value of a probability forecast from portfolio theory
- An incentive compatible scoring rule for ordinal judgments of expected utility maximizers
- Evaluating second-order probability judgments with strictly proper scoring rules
- Experience in public goods experiments
- Belief formation in a signaling game without common prior: an experiment
- Identification of non-equilibrium beliefs in games of incomplete information using experimental data
- In search of good probability assessors: an experimental comparison of elicitation rules for confidence judgments
- Comonotonic proper scoring rules to measure ambiguity and subjective beliefs
- An Overview of Applications of Proper Scoring Rules
- The binarized scoring rule
- Tailored scoring rules for probabilities
- Robust scoring rules
- Measuring beliefs under ambiguity
- On the Road to Making Science of “Art”: Risk Bias in Market Scoring Rules
- Incentive-compatible surveys via posterior probabilities
- Accounting for noise in the microfoundations of information aggregation
- Belief elicitation in experiments: Is there a hedging problem?
- Experiments with the traveler's dilemma: welfare, strategic choice and implicit collusion
- Bidding behaviour in experimental auctions under risk and uncertainty
- Probabilism, entropies and strictly proper scoring rules
- Proper scoring rules for general decision models
- Fragility of information cascades: an experimental study using elicited beliefs
This page was built for publication: A truth serum for non-Bayesians: correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3655348)
