Geometric generalisations of SHAKE and RATTLE

From MaRDI portal
Publication:404281

DOI10.1007/S10208-013-9163-YzbMATH Open1347.37131arXiv1207.3367OpenAlexW2111027538MaRDI QIDQ404281FDOQ404281

Klas Modin, Olivier Verdier, Robert I. McLachlan, Matt Wilkins

Publication date: 4 September 2014

Published in: Foundations of Computational Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A geometric analysis of the Shake and Rattle methods for constrained Hamiltonian problems is carried out. The study reveals the underlying differential geometric foundation of the two methods, and the exact relation between them. In addition, the geometric insight naturally generalises Shake and Rattle to allow for a strictly larger class of constrained Hamiltonian systems than in the classical setting. In order for Shake and Rattle to be well defined, two basic assumptions are needed. First, a nondegeneracy assumption, which is a condition on the Hamiltonian, i.e., on the dynamics of the system. Second, a coisotropy assumption, which is a condition on the geometry of the constrained phase space. Non-trivial examples of systems fulfilling, and failing to fulfill, these assumptions are given.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3367





Cites Work


Cited In (12)






This page was built for publication: Geometric generalisations of SHAKE and RATTLE

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q404281)