Sticks and carrots for the design of international climate agreements with renegotiations
DOI10.1007/s10479-010-0795-xzbMath1301.91038OpenAlexW2140023646MaRDI QIDQ475286
Rob Dellink, Hans-Peter Weikard
Publication date: 26 November 2014
Published in: Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0795-x
international environmental agreementsclimate agreementspartition function approachrenegotiationssharing rulesstability of coalitions
Other game-theoretic models (91A40) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76) Economic models of real-world systems (e.g., electricity markets, etc.) (91B74) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)
Related Items (5)
Cites Work
- Can international environmental cooperation be bought?
- Coalition-proof Nash equilibria. I: Concepts
- Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games
- Stable international environmental agreements with a stock pollutant, uncertainty and learning
- Dynamic effects on the stability of international environmental agreements
- An infinite-horizon model of dynamic membership of international environmental agreements
- Regional versus global cooperation for climate control
- Renegotiation in Finitely Repeated Games
This page was built for publication: Sticks and carrots for the design of international climate agreements with renegotiations