Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Verification in argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Verification in attack-incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Credulous and skeptical acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Complexity of Possible and Necessary Existence Problems in Abstract Argumentation
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3888913 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3639144 (Why is no real title available?)
- Aggregation of Attack Relations: A Social-Choice Theoretical Analysis of Defeasibility Criteria
- Argumentation in artificial intelligence
- Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument
- Coherence in finite argument systems.
- Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules
- Complexity results and algorithms for extension enforcement in abstract argumentation
- Complexity theory and cryptology. An introduction to cryptocomplexity.
- Credulous and skeptical acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Determining possible and necessary winners given partial orders
- Dynamics in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Abstraction Principles and the Grounded Extension
- Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
- Fair division under ordinal preferences: computing envy-free allocations of indivisible goods
- Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories
- Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks
- New candidates welcome! Possible winners with respect to the addition of new candidates
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
- Probabilistic qualification of attack in abstract argumentation
- SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis
- The polynomial-time hierarchy
- The possible winner problem with uncertain weights
- Verification in argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Verification in attack-incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- What does it take to enforce an argument? Minimal change in abstract argumentation
Cited in
(25)- Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks
- The possible winner with uncertain weights problem
- Verification in attack-incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Verification in argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Credulous and skeptical acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Taking into account ``who said what in abstract argumentation: complexity results
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks: grounded semantics and principles
- Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- The possible winner problem with uncertain weights revisited
- Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments
- Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks
- Complexity of nonemptiness in control argumentation frameworks
- Constrained incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Handling Ignorance in Argumentation: Semantics of Partial Argumentation Frameworks
- How to manage supports in incomplete argumentation
- A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks
- Verifying Refutations with Extended Resolution
- On dynamics in structured argumentation formalisms
- Abstract argumentation with qualitative uncertainty: an analysis in dynamic logic
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Integrating individual preferences into collective argumentation
- On incompleteness in abstract argumentation: complexity and expressiveness
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Dynamic epistemic logics for abstract argumentation
- I don't care, I don't know \(\dots \) I know too much! on incompleteness and undecidedness in abstract argumentation
This page was built for publication: Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q668774)
