Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth

DOI10.1007/s11229-011-0031-5zbMath1275.91048OpenAlexW2171809879MaRDI QIDQ383025

Jan Sprenger, Stephan Hartmann

Publication date: 25 November 2013

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0031-5

zbMATH Keywords

justificationjudgment aggregationdiscursive dilemmareasonstruth-tracking

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Related Items (9)

The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation ⋮ The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory ⋮ A game-theoretic approach to peer disagreement ⋮ Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation ⋮ The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation ⋮ Truth approximation, belief merging, and peer disagreement ⋮ Group disagreement: a belief aggregation perspective ⋮ A probabilistic evaluation framework for preference aggregation reflecting group homogeneity ⋮ Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information

Cites Work

• Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
• The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
• The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
• The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
• Reliable Methods of Judgement Aggregation

This page was built for publication: Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth