Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
From MaRDI portal
Publication:899166
DOI10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.005zbMath1346.68187OpenAlexW2340952989MaRDI QIDQ899166
Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
Publication date: 21 December 2015
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.005
Related Items (7)
A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation ⋮ Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations ⋮ Hybrid Reasoning on a Bipolar Argumentation Framework ⋮ Modelling last-act attempted crime in criminal law ⋮ A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments ⋮ Graded labellings for abstract argumentation ⋮ Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A logic-based calculus of events
- On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance
- Stratification of normative systems with intermediaries
- Deontic epistemic stit logic distinguishing modes of mens rea
- A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values
- Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: A computational model and an intelligent learning environment
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic
- The many faces of counts-as: A formal analysis of constitutive rules
- A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
- Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning.
- An executable specification of a formal argumentation protocol
- Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
- The carneades model of argument and burden of proof
- Question-begging in non-cumulative systems
- Belief revision and epistemology
- Input/output logics
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Two approaches to the formalisation of defeasible deontic reasoning
- Computing strong and weak permissions in defeasible logic
- Dynamic Argument Systems: A Formal Model of Argumentation Processes Based on Situation Calculus
- Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
- Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
- Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic
- Hierarchical representation of legal knowledge with metaprogramming in logic
- DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- An Analysis of some Deontic Logics
- Introducing the Logic and Law Corner
- A computational theory of normative positions
This page was built for publication: Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
