Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule

DOI10.1007/S00199-002-0314-7zbMath1040.91064OpenAlexW2057891829WikidataQ59972812 ScholiaQ59972812MaRDI QIDQ1404126

Toru Hokari, William Thomson

Publication date: 20 August 2003

Published in: Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-002-0314-7

zbMATH Keywords

ConsistencyClaims problemsConverse consistencyWeighted generalizations of Talmud rule

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)

Related Items (28)

Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims ⋮ Rationing problems with ex-ante conditions ⋮ The TAL-family of rules for bankruptcy problems ⋮ Equal sacrifice taxation ⋮ New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule ⋮ The two-agent claims-truncated proportional rule has no consistent extension: a constructive proof ⋮ Priority classes and weighted constrained equal awards rules for the claims problem ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a survey. ⋮ Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses ⋮ Axiomatic analysis of liability problems with rooted-tree networks in tort law ⋮ Weighted bankruptcy rules and the museum pass problem ⋮ A characterization of a family of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Asymmetric parametric division rules ⋮ Collective rationality and monotone path division rules ⋮ The Talmud rule and the securement of agents' awards. ⋮ Minimal conversely consistent extension of the men-optimal solution ⋮ Least manipulable envy-free rules in economies with indivisibilities ⋮ Secured lower bound, composition up, and minimal rights first for bankruptcy problems ⋮ On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach ⋮ Proportional rules for state contingent claims ⋮ Priority and proportionality in bankruptcy ⋮ On properties of division rules lifted by bilateral consistency ⋮ Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Flow sharing and bankruptcy games ⋮ Partial-implementation invariance and claims problems ⋮ PROPORTIONALITY AND NON-MANIPULABILITY IN BANKRUPTCY PROBLEMS ⋮ Two families of rules for the adjudication of conflicting claims ⋮ Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: an update

This page was built for publication: Claims problems and weighted generalizations of the Talmud rule