Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1935594
DOI10.1007/s10472-012-9317-7zbMath1280.68255OpenAlexW2086051680WikidataQ110528559 ScholiaQ110528559MaRDI QIDQ1935594
Leendert van der Torre, Serena Villata, Guido Boella, Dov M. Gabbay
Publication date: 18 February 2013
Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/14507
Knowledge representation (68T30) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Agent technology and artificial intelligence (68T42)
Related Items (7)
Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation ⋮ An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support ⋮ Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks ⋮ Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations ⋮ On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach ⋮ A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation ⋮ Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- An argumentation framework in default logic
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
- Fibring argumentation frames
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Arguing about the Trustworthiness of the Information Sources
- Metalevel argumentation
- An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
- Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
- Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
This page was built for publication: Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation