Equilibrium consequence of welfare egalitarianism
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A Fairness Justification of Utilitarianism
- Are incentives against economic justice?
- Distortion of preferences, income distribution, and the case for a linear income tax
- Distortion of Utilities and the Bargaining Problem
- Dominance of truthtelling and the lattice structure of Nash equilibria
- Equilibrium allocations of Walrasian preference games
- Fairness and well-being measurement
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3402334 (Why is no real title available?)
- Income distribution and distortion of preferences: The l commodity case
- Least concave utility functions
- Let them cheat!
- Manipulation of preferences and relative utilitarianism
- Maximal manipulation of envy-free solutions in economies with indivisible goods and money
- Notions of equal, or equivalent, opportunities
- Preference manipulations lead to the uniform rule
- Preference revelation games and strict cores of multiple‐type housing market problems
- Preference revelation games and strong cores of allocation problems with indivisibilities
- Sincere and sophisticated players in an equal-income market
- The Division Problem with Single-Peaked Preferences: A Characterization of the Uniform Allocation Rule
- The Manipulability of Resource Allocation Mechanisms
- The manipulability of the Shapley-value
- The positive consequence of strategic manipulation in indivisible good allocation
This page was built for publication: Equilibrium consequence of welfare egalitarianism
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q7364447)