Hierarchical voting
From MaRDI portal
The authors use voting operators to transform the sets of voters' opinions in the form of individual binary relations into collective binary relations. The emphasis of the discussion is of Arrow's independence of irrelevant alternatives (locality) condition, extending a paper by \textit{J. A. Ferejohn} and \textit{P. C. Fishburn} [J. Econ. Theory 21, 28-45 (1979; Zbl 0413.90005)]. The authors succeeded in generalizing some of the well known results of voting theory.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Axioms for Lexicographic Preferences
- Collective Choice Rules without the Pareto Principle
- General theory of best variants choice: Some aspects
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3924457 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3894772 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3361657 (Why is no real title available?)
- Local operators in models of social choice
- Representations of binary decision rules by generalized decisiveness structures
- Social choice and individual values
- The Arrow paradox in group choice theory (analysis of the problem)
Cited in
(11)- Functional voting operators: The non-monotonic case
- Hierarchical Arrow social welfare functions
- Equity, hierarchy, and ordinal social choice
- Generalized Rawlsianism
- Strategic candidacy for multivalued voting procedures
- Dictatorial voting operators
- Explicit form of neutral social decision rules for basic rationality conditions.
- The history of social choice in Russia and the Soviet Union
- A simple voting scheme generates all binary relations on finite sets
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7300319 (Why is no real title available?)
- Hierarchies of power in non-binary social choice
This page was built for publication: Hierarchical voting
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1089231)