Aggregating experts' opinions to select the winner of a competition
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2021827
DOI10.1007/S00182-020-00712-6zbMATH Open1461.91122OpenAlexW2907976832MaRDI QIDQ2021827FDOQ2021827
Authors: Pablo Amorós 
Publication date: 27 April 2021
Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://theeconomics.uma.es/malagawpseries/Papers/METCwp2018-3.pdf
Recommendations
- Aggregation of expert opinions
- Aggregating expert judgement
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3978224
- Aggregating information by voting: the wisdom of the experts versus the wisdom of the masses
- Aggregating and weighting expert knowledge in group decision making
- Using supermajority rules to aggregate judgments of possibly biased experts
- Aggregation of preferences with the account of expert's competence in the problem of decision making
- Combining expert opinions in prior elicitation
- Aggregation of multiple prior opinions
- Extracting the collective wisdom in probabilistic judgments
Cites Work
- Eliciting information from multiple experts
- A model of expertise
- Eliciting socially optimal rankings from unfair jurors
- Picking the winners
- The equivalence of strong positive association and strategy-proofness
- On constant Maskin monotonic social choice functions
- Aggregation of expert opinions
- A Bayesian model of voting in juries
- Impartial nominations for a prize
- Symmetry and impartial lotteries
Cited In (5)
This page was built for publication: Aggregating experts' opinions to select the winner of a competition
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2021827)
