Picking the winners
From MaRDI portal
Publication:378331
DOI10.1007/S00182-012-0332-ZzbMATH Open1280.91005OpenAlexW2165844892MaRDI QIDQ378331FDOQ378331
Authors: Pablo Amorós 
Publication date: 11 November 2013
Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-012-0332-z
Recommendations
- Choosing the winner of a competition using natural mechanisms: conditions based on the jury
- Selecting winners with partially honest jurors
- A natural mechanism to choose the deserving winner when the jury is made up of all contestants
- A natural mechanism for eliciting rankings when jurors have favorites
- Subgame perfect implementation of the deserving winner of a competition with natural mechanisms
Cites Work
- Interested experts and policy advice: Multiple referrals under open rule
- Eliciting information from multiple experts
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality
- Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections With Private Information
- Implementation in Undominated Strategies: A Look at Bounded Mechanisms
- The Theory of Implementation of Social Choice Rules
- Eliciting socially optimal rankings from unfair jurors
- Subgame Perfect Implementation
- Implementation Via Nash Equilibria
- A natural mechanism to choose the deserving winner when the jury is made up of all contestants
- The scholarship assignment problem
- Subgame perfect implementation: A necessary and almost sufficient condition
- On Nash implementation of social choice correspondences
- Strategy Space Reduction in Maskin's Theorem: Sufficient Conditions for Nash Implementation
- Aggregation of expert opinions
- A simple proof of Maskin's theorem on Nash implementation
- Convergence results for unanimous voting
- A Bayesian model of voting in juries
Cited In (15)
- Aggregating experts' opinions to select the winner of a competition
- An axiomatic analysis of the papal conclave
- Sensitivity analyses and measurements for group decisions using weighted scoring rules
- Selecting winners with partially honest jurors
- Subgame perfect implementation of the deserving winner of a competition with natural mechanisms
- A natural mechanism for eliciting rankings when jurors have favorites
- A natural mechanism to choose the deserving winner when the jury is made up of all contestants
- Eliciting socially optimal rankings from unfair jurors
- On incentive compatible competitive selection protocols
- Eliciting the socially optimal allocation from responsible agents
- Implementation with a sympathizer
- Evaluation and strategic manipulation
- Choosing the winner of a competition using natural mechanisms: conditions based on the jury
- Nash implementation of supermajority rules
- Winning a Pool Is Harder Than You Thought
This page was built for publication: Picking the winners
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q378331)
