Picking the winners
From MaRDI portal
Publication:378331
DOI10.1007/S00182-012-0332-ZzbMath1280.91005OpenAlexW2165844892MaRDI QIDQ378331
Publication date: 11 November 2013
Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-012-0332-z
Related Items (9)
Selecting winners with partially honest jurors ⋮ Subgame perfect implementation of the deserving winner of a competition with natural mechanisms ⋮ Eliciting the socially optimal allocation from responsible agents ⋮ Sensitivity analyses and measurements for group decisions using weighted scoring rules ⋮ Evaluation and strategic manipulation ⋮ Implementation with a sympathizer ⋮ Aggregating experts' opinions to select the winner of a competition ⋮ An axiomatic analysis of the papal conclave ⋮ Choosing the winner of a competition using natural mechanisms: conditions based on the jury
Cites Work
- A natural mechanism to choose the deserving winner when the jury is made up of all contestants
- Convergence results for unanimous voting
- A Bayesian model of voting in juries
- The scholarship assignment problem
- Subgame perfect implementation: A necessary and almost sufficient condition
- Aggregation of expert opinions
- Eliciting socially optimal rankings from unfair jurors
- A simple proof of Maskin's theorem on Nash implementation
- On Nash implementation of social choice correspondences
- Interested experts and policy advice: Multiple referrals under open rule
- Eliciting information from multiple experts
- Strategy Space Reduction in Maskin's Theorem: Sufficient Conditions for Nash Implementation
- Subgame Perfect Implementation
- Implementation Via Nash Equilibria
- Implementation in Undominated Strategies: A Look at Bounded Mechanisms
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality
- Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections With Private Information
- The Theory of Implementation of Social Choice Rules
This page was built for publication: Picking the winners
