Eliciting the socially optimal allocation from responsible agents
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1680147
Recommendations
Cites work
- A crash course in implementation theory
- A natural mechanism to choose the deserving winner when the jury is made up of all contestants
- Direct implementation with minimally honest individuals
- Divide-and-permute
- Eliciting socially optimal rankings from unfair jurors
- Handbook of game theory with economic applications. Vol. 3
- Implementation Via Nash Equilibria
- Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality
- Nash implementation with partially honest individuals
- Nash-implementation of the no-envy solution on symmetric domains of economies
- Natural implementation with semi-responsible agents in pure exchange economies
- Picking the winners
- Role of honesty in full implementation
- Subgame perfect implementation of the deserving winner of a competition with natural mechanisms
- The Theory of Implementation of Social Choice Rules
- The scholarship assignment problem
Cited in
(8)- Strong implementation with partially honest individuals
- Motives and implementation with rights structures
- Optimal allocation without transfer payments
- Choosing the winner of a competition using natural mechanisms: conditions based on the jury
- On voluntary and efficient allocations
- Implementation with a sympathizer
- Epistemological implementation of social choice functions
- Evaluation and strategic manipulation
This page was built for publication: Eliciting the socially optimal allocation from responsible agents
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1680147)