Eliciting the socially optimal allocation from responsible agents
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1680147
DOI10.1016/J.JMATECO.2017.09.001zbMATH Open1415.91177OpenAlexW2595079790MaRDI QIDQ1680147FDOQ1680147
Authors: Battal Doğan
Publication date: 22 November 2017
Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.09.001
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Handbook of game theory with economic applications. Vol. 3
- Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality
- A crash course in implementation theory
- The Theory of Implementation of Social Choice Rules
- Eliciting socially optimal rankings from unfair jurors
- Role of honesty in full implementation
- Subgame perfect implementation of the deserving winner of a competition with natural mechanisms
- Picking the winners
- Implementation Via Nash Equilibria
- A natural mechanism to choose the deserving winner when the jury is made up of all contestants
- Nash implementation with partially honest individuals
- The scholarship assignment problem
- Divide-and-permute
- Direct implementation with minimally honest individuals
- Nash-implementation of the no-envy solution on symmetric domains of economies
- Natural implementation with semi-responsible agents in pure exchange economies
Cited In (8)
- Epistemological implementation of social choice functions
- Motives and implementation with rights structures
- On voluntary and efficient allocations
- Strong implementation with partially honest individuals
- Implementation with a sympathizer
- Evaluation and strategic manipulation
- Choosing the winner of a competition using natural mechanisms: conditions based on the jury
- Optimal allocation without transfer payments
This page was built for publication: Eliciting the socially optimal allocation from responsible agents
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1680147)