Group control for consent rules with consecutive qualifications
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2682019
DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.11.003zbMath1506.91048OpenAlexW4310062886MaRDI QIDQ2682019
Publication date: 31 January 2023
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.11.003
integer linear programmingpolynomial-time solvabilitygroup identificationconsent rulesconsecutive-ones
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- The shield that never was: societies with single-peaked preferences are more open to manipulation and control
- Cyclical scheduling and multi-shift scheduling: complexity and approximation algorithms
- Call control in rings
- Group identification
- Majority voting on restricted domains
- Matching is as easy as matrix inversion
- How hard is it to control an election?
- Testing for the consecutive ones property, interval graphs, and graph planarity using PQ-tree algorithms
- Between liberalism and democracy.
- PC trees and circular-ones arrangements.
- Group identification: an integrated approach
- Bypassing Combinatorial Protections: Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Single-Peaked Electorates
- Computational Aspects of Nearly Single-Peaked Electorates
- Optimizing over Consecutive 1's and Circular 1's Constraints
- Cyclic Scheduling via Integer Programs with Circular Ones
- The complexity of restricted spanning tree problems
- Preferences Single-Peaked on a Circle
- Control and Bribery in Voting
This page was built for publication: Group control for consent rules with consecutive qualifications