How hard is it to control an election?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1200886

DOI10.1016/0895-7177(92)90085-YzbMath0757.90008MaRDI QIDQ1200886

Michael A. Trick, John J. III Bartholdi, Craig A. Tovey

Publication date: 16 January 1993

Published in: Mathematical and Computer Modelling (Search for Journal in Brave)




Related Items (76)

Tennis manipulation: can we help Serena Williams win another tournament? Or can we control a knockout tournament with reasonable complexity?Isomorphic Distances Among ElectionsThe Complexity of Controlling Condorcet, Fallback, and k-Veto Elections by Replacing Candidates or VotersAlgorithms for gerrymandering over graphsGeneralized juntas and NP-hard setsThe learnability of voting rulesCondorcet-consistent and approximately strategyproof tournament rulesThe possible winner problem with uncertain weights revisitedResolute control: forbidding candidates from winning an election is hardSchulze and ranked-pairs voting are fixed-parameter tractable to bribe, manipulate, and controlThe complexity of priced control in electionsStudies in Computational Aspects of VotingControl of Condorcet voting: complexity and a relation-algebraic approachSolving hard control problems in voting systems via integer programmingOptimal defense against election control by deleting voter groupsVote trading in public electionsComputational complexity of manipulation: a surveyPrices matter for the parameterized complexity of shift briberyThe complexity of probabilistic lobbyingThe control complexity of \(r\)-Approval: from the single-peaked case to the general caseControlling weighted voting games by deleting or adding players with or without changing the quotaNormalized range voting broadly resists controlParameterized complexity of control by voter selection in Maximin, Copeland, Borda, Bucklin, and Approval election systemsComparing multiagent systems research in combinatorial auctions and votingComplexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rulesConstraint-based electoral districting using a new compactness measure: an application to PortugalNP-hardness of two edge cover generalizations with applications to control and bribery for approval votingPriced gerrymanderingGroup control for consent rules with consecutive qualificationsHotelling-Downs equilibria: moving beyond plurality variantsThe possible winner with uncertain weights problemThe shield that never was: societies with single-peaked preferences are more open to manipulation and controlOn the complexity of bribery and manipulation in tournaments with uncertain informationCopeland Voting Fully Resists Constructive ControlComplexity of manipulation and bribery in premise-based judgment aggregation with simple formulasThe nonmanipulative vote-deficits of voting rulesChallenges to complexity shields that are supposed to protect elections against manipulation and control: a surveyNew candidates welcome! Possible winners with respect to the addition of new candidatesComplexity of and algorithms for the manipulation of Borda, Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rulesManipulation can be hard in tractable voting systems even for constant-sized coalitionsOn the Computational Complexity of Variants of Combinatorial Voter Control in ElectionsParameterized complexity of control problems in Maximin electionIs computational complexity a barrier to manipulation?Duplication monotonicity in the allocation of indivisible goodsThe complexity of manipulative attacks in nearly single-peaked electoratesVoting Procedures, Complexity ofOn complexity of lobbying in multiple referendaControl complexity in Borda elections: solving all open cases of offline control and some cases of online controlBribery and Control in Stable MarriageThe complexity of controlling candidate-sequential electionsControl complexity in Bucklin and fallback voting: a theoretical analysisControl complexity in Bucklin and fallback voting: an experimental analysisComputer science and decision theorySincere-Strategy Preference-Based Approval Voting Broadly Resists ControlComplexity of control by partitioning veto elections and of control by adding candidates to plurality electionsA parameterized perspective on protecting electionsObtaining a proportional allocation by deleting itemsBinary linear programming solutions and non-approximability for control problems in voting systemsMixed integer programming with convex/concave constraints: fixed-parameter tractability and applications to multicovering and votingHybrid Elections Broaden Complexity-Theoretic Resistance to ControlSincere-Strategy Preference-Based Approval Voting Fully Resists Constructive Control and Broadly Resists Destructive ControlComputational Aspects of Approval VotingAnyone but him: the complexity of precluding an alternativeParameterized computational complexity of control problems in voting systemsParameterized dichotomy of choosing committees based on approval votes in the presence of outliersParameterized complexity of voter control in multi-peaked electionsParameterized complexity of candidate control in elections and related digraph problemsControlling sub-tournaments: easy or hard problem? Theoretical vs. practical analysisParameterized Complexity of Candidate Control in Elections and Related Digraph ProblemsNetwork-Based Vertex DissolutionComplexity of shift bribery for iterative voting rulesStructural control in weighted voting gamesParameterized Complexity of Control and Bribery for d-Approval ElectionsCombinatorial voter control in electionsExploiting social influence to control elections based on positional scoring rulesParameterized complexity of control and bribery for \(d\)-approval elections



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: How hard is it to control an election?