The computational difficulty of manipulating an election

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1824524

DOI10.1007/BF00295861zbMath0682.90007OpenAlexW2003296459MaRDI QIDQ1824524

Michael A. Trick, John J. III Bartholdi, Craig A. Tovey

Publication date: 1989

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00295861




Related Items (79)

The complexity of online bribery in sequential electionsTennis manipulation: can we help Serena Williams win another tournament? Or can we control a knockout tournament with reasonable complexity?Complexity of Safe Strategic VotingIsomorphic Distances Among ElectionsAlgorithms for gerrymandering over graphsAlgorithms for the coalitional manipulation problemOn the difficulty of making social choicesResolute control: forbidding candidates from winning an election is hardManipulation complexity of same-system runoff electionsSchulze and ranked-pairs voting are fixed-parameter tractable to bribe, manipulate, and controlStudies in Computational Aspects of VotingThe complexity of online manipulation of sequential electionsVote trading in public electionsComputational complexity of manipulation: a surveyDichotomy for voting systemsA quantitative Gobbard-Satterthwaite theorem without neutralityThe complexity of probabilistic lobbyingVoting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the electionNormalized range voting broadly resists controlComparing multiagent systems research in combinatorial auctions and votingComplexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rulesIs it ever safe to vote strategically?Byzantine preferential votingComplexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rulesBounded incentives in manipulating the probabilistic serial ruleThe shield that never was: societies with single-peaked preferences are more open to manipulation and controlOn the complexity of achieving proportional representationOn the complexity of bribery and manipulation in tournaments with uncertain informationPervasive dominationEfficient and accurate inference for mixtures of Mallows models with Spearman distanceComplexity of manipulation and bribery in premise-based judgment aggregation with simple formulasKernelization complexity of possible winner and coalitional manipulation problems in votingA note on the complexity of manipulating weighted Schulze votingStrategic voting in negotiating teamsThe nonmanipulative vote-deficits of voting rulesChallenges to complexity shields that are supposed to protect elections against manipulation and control: a surveyBribery in voting with CP-netsUnnamed ItemLocal distance constrained bribery in votingComplexity of and algorithms for the manipulation of Borda, Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rulesManipulation can be hard in tractable voting systems even for constant-sized coalitionsPopular rankingParameterized complexity of control problems in Maximin electionIs computational complexity a barrier to manipulation?The complexity of manipulative attacks in nearly single-peaked electoratesVoting Procedures, Complexity ofDistance restricted manipulation in votingOn complexity of lobbying in multiple referendaControl complexity in Borda elections: solving all open cases of offline control and some cases of online controlComplexity of manipulation with partial information in votingOn random social choice functions with the tops-only propertyHow hard is it to control an election?Frugal bribery in votingComputability of simple games: A characterization and application to the coreOn the evaluation of election outcomes under uncertaintyControl complexity in Bucklin and fallback voting: a theoretical analysisControl complexity in Bucklin and fallback voting: an experimental analysisComputability of simple games: a complete investigation of the sixty-four possibilitiesHow to allocate review tasks for robust rankingCognitive hierarchy and voting manipulation in \(k\)-approval votingComputer science and decision theorySincere-Strategy Preference-Based Approval Voting Broadly Resists ControlHuman centered processes and decision support systemsComplexity of control by partitioning veto elections and of control by adding candidates to plurality electionsA new perspective on implementation by voting treesExact algorithms for weighted and unweighted Borda manipulation problemsBinary linear programming solutions and non-approximability for control problems in voting systemsHybrid Elections Broaden Complexity-Theoretic Resistance to ControlSincere-Strategy Preference-Based Approval Voting Fully Resists Constructive Control and Broadly Resists Destructive ControlA brief history of social choice and welfare theoryComputational Aspects of Approval VotingAnyone but him: the complexity of precluding an alternativeParameterized computational complexity of control problems in voting systemsThe Nakamura numbers for computable simple gamesParameterized complexity of candidate control in elections and related digraph problemsControlling sub-tournaments: easy or hard problem? Theoretical vs. practical analysisGibbard-Satterthwaite games for \(k\)-approval voting rulesComplexity of shift bribery for iterative voting rulesStructural control in weighted voting games



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: The computational difficulty of manipulating an election