Complexity of shift bribery for iterative voting rules
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2095550
Recommendations
Cites work
- Anyone but him: the complexity of precluding an alternative
- Barriers to manipulation in voting
- Campaign management under approval-driven voting rules
- Challenges to complexity shields that are supposed to protect elections against manipulation and control: a survey
- Clustering to minimize the maximum intercluster distance
- Complexity of and algorithms for the manipulation of Borda, Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rules
- Control and bribery in voting
- Determining possible and necessary winners given partial orders
- Handbook of Computational Social Choice
- How hard is bribery in elections?
- How hard is it to control an election?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3639144 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 610968 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6928629 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2182815 (Why is no real title available?)
- Introduction to the theory of voting
- Large-scale election campaigns: combinatorial shift bribery
- Llull and Copeland Voting Computationally Resist Bribery and Constructive Control
- Paradoxes of Preferential Voting
- Single transferable vote resists strategic voting
- Swap bribery
- The computational difficulty of manipulating an election
- Voting and bribing in single-exponential time
- When are elections with few candidates hard to manipulate?
- Where are the hard manipulation problems?
- XSAT and NAE-SAT of linear CNF classes
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Complexity of shift bribery for iterative voting rules
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2095550)