Campaign management under approval-driven voting rules

From MaRDI portal
Publication:513294

DOI10.1007/S00453-015-0064-0zbMATH Open1358.91048arXiv1501.00387OpenAlexW1698830886MaRDI QIDQ513294FDOQ513294


Authors: Piotr Faliszewski, Edith Elkind, Ildikó Schlotter Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 6 March 2017

Published in: Algorithmica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Approval-like voting rules, such as Sincere-Strategy Preference-Based Approval voting (SP-AV), the Bucklin rule (an adaptive variant of k-Approval voting), and the Fallback rule (an adaptive variant of SP-AV) have many desirable properties: for example, they are easy to understand and encourage the candidates to choose electoral platforms that have a broad appeal. In this paper, we investigate both classic and parameterized computational complexity of electoral campaign management under such rules. We focus on two methods that can be used to promote a given candidate: asking voters to move this candidate upwards in their preference order or asking them to change the number of candidates they approve of. We show that finding an optimal campaign management strategy of the first type is easy for both Bucklin and Fallback. In contrast, the second method is computationally hard even if the degree to which we need to affect the votes is small. Nevertheless, we identify a large class of scenarios that admit fixed-parameter tractable algorithms.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00387




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (11)





This page was built for publication: Campaign management under approval-driven voting rules

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q513294)