Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules
From MaRDI portal
Publication:898752
DOI10.1016/J.MATHSOCSCI.2015.03.006zbMATH Open1331.91063OpenAlexW2014337128MaRDI QIDQ898752FDOQ898752
Olivia J. Erdélyi, Jörg Rothe, Dorothea Baumeister, Gábor Erdélyi
Publication date: 18 December 2015
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2015.03.006
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Computational Aspects of Approval Voting
- How Hard Is it to Bribe the Judges? A Study of the Complexity of Bribery in Judgment Aggregation
- Complexity of Judgment Aggregation
- The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
- Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
- Strategy-proof allocation of indivisible goods
- Strategic manipulability without resoluteness or shared beliefs: Gibbard-Satterthwaite generalized
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- Towards a dichotomy for the possible winner problem in elections based on scoring rules
- Determining Possible and Necessary Winners Given Partial Orders
- Strategyproof Approximation of the Minimax on Networks
- When are elections with few candidates hard to manipulate?
- Single transferable vote resists strategic voting
- The computational difficulty of manipulating an election
- Fair division of indivisible items
- On complexity of lobbying in multiple referenda
- Search versus Decision for Election Manipulation Problems
- Swap Bribery
- Llull and Copeland Voting Computationally Resist Bribery and Constructive Control
- How Hard Is Bribery in Elections?
- Barriers to Manipulation in Voting
- Taking the final step to a full dichotomy of the possible winner problem in pure scoring rules
- Complexity theory and cryptology. An introduction to cryptocomplexity.
- The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions
- On miniaturized problems in parameterized complexity theory
- Strategy-proofness, solidarity, and consistency for multiple assignment problems
- Fair Division under Ordinal Preferences: Computing Envy-Free Allocations of Indivisible Goods
- Judgment Aggregation
- Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
- The complexity of probabilistic lobbying
- Coalitional unanimity versus strategy-proofness in coalition formation problems
- Computational Aspects of Manipulation and Control in Judgment Aggregation
Cited In (11)
- The possible winner problem with uncertain weights revisited
- Complexity of manipulation and bribery in premise-based judgment aggregation with simple formulas
- Complexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules
- The complexity of priced control in elections
- Approximation and hardness of shift-Bribery
- Structural control in weighted voting games
- Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information
- The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation
- Verification in incomplete argumentation frameworks
- Path-disruption games: bribery and a probabilistic model
- The possible winner with uncertain weights problem
This page was built for publication: Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q898752)