Strategic voting in negotiating teams
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2695442
DOI10.1007/978-3-030-87756-9_14OpenAlexW3208688865MaRDI QIDQ2695442
Publication date: 31 March 2023
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.14097
Decision theory (91B06) Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32) Social choice (91B14) Matching models (91B68)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Bargaining over a finite set of alternatives
- Algorithms for the coalitional manipulation problem
- Single transferable vote resists strategic voting
- Strategy-proofness of social welfare functions: The use of the Kemeny distance between preference orderings
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
- The computational difficulty of manipulating an election
- Strategy-proof preference aggregation: possibilities and characterizations
- Minimizing makespan in a two-machine flow shop with delays and unit-time operations is NP-hard
- When are elections with few candidates hard to manipulate?
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- Barriers to Manipulation in Voting
- Noncooperative Foundations of the Area Monotonic Solution
- Algorithms and Computation
- Exact algorithms for weighted and unweighted Borda manipulation problems
This page was built for publication: Strategic voting in negotiating teams