Exploiting the guilt aversion of others: do agents do it and is it effective?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:272145
DOI10.1007/S11238-015-9513-0zbMath1378.91044OpenAlexW3121594812MaRDI QIDQ272145
Publication date: 20 April 2016
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-015-9513-0
Related Items (1)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Competition fosters trust
- The framing of games and the psychology of play
- Testing guilt aversion
- Bare promises: an experiment
- Dynamic psychological games
- Indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game
- Psychological games and sequential rationality
- How to identify trust and reciprocity.
- A theory of sequential reciprocity
- Trust, reciprocity, and social history
- Social norms, information, and trust among strangers: theory and evidence
- Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game
- Shaping beliefs in experimental markets for expert services: guilt aversion and the impact of promises and money-burning options
- The self-fulfilling property of trust: an experimental study
- Truth or Consequences: An Experiment
- Measuring Inequity Aversion in a Heterogeneous Population Using Experimental Decisions and Subjective Probabilities
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- What Drives Taxi Drivers? A Field Experiment on Fraud in a Market for Credence Goods
- Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
- Promises and Partnership
This page was built for publication: Exploiting the guilt aversion of others: do agents do it and is it effective?
