Exploiting the guilt aversion of others: do agents do it and is it effective?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:272145
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
- A theory of sequential reciprocity
- Bare promises: an experiment
- Competition fosters trust
- Dynamic psychological games
- How to identify trust and reciprocity.
- Indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game
- Measuring Inequity Aversion in a Heterogeneous Population Using Experimental Decisions and Subjective Probabilities
- Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game
- Promises and Partnership
- Psychological games and sequential rationality
- Shaping beliefs in experimental markets for expert services: guilt aversion and the impact of promises and money-burning options
- Social norms, information, and trust among strangers: theory and evidence
- Testing guilt aversion
- The framing of games and the psychology of play
- The self-fulfilling property of trust: an experimental study
- Trust, reciprocity, and social history
- Truth or consequences: an experiment
- Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
- What drives taxi drivers? A field experiment on fraud in a market for credence goods
Cited in
(6)
This page was built for publication: Exploiting the guilt aversion of others: do agents do it and is it effective?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q272145)