Bounded rationality, strategy simplification, and equilibrium
From MaRDI portal
Publication:361802
Abstract: It is frequently suggested that predictions made by game theory could be improved by considering computational restrictions when modeling agents. Under the supposition that players in a game may desire to balance maximization of payoff with minimization of strategy complexity, Rubinstein and co-authors studied forms of Nash equilibrium where strategies are maximally simplified in that no strategy can be further simplified without sacrificing payoff. Inspired by this line of work, we introduce a notion of equilibrium whereby strategies are also maximally simplified, but with respect to a simplification procedure that is more careful in that a player will not simplify if the simplification incents other players to deviate. We study such equilibria in two-player machine games in which players choose finite automata that succinctly represent strategies for repeated games; in this context, we present techniques for establishing that an outcome is at equilibrium and present results on the structure of equilibria.
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4202070
- Bounded rationality and correlated equilibria
- Bounded rationality in multiobjective games
- Models of Bounded Rationality and Mechanism Design
- Toward a Strategic Foundation for Rational Expectations Equilibrium
- Bounded rationality and stability of solutions to some equilibrium problems
- The complexity of resource allocation and price mechanisms under bounded rationality
- Bounded rationality. A Simon-like explication
- Obvious strategyproofness, bounded rationality and approximation
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4202070 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1054720 (Why is no real title available?)
- A course in game theory.
- Algorithmic rationality: game theory with costly computation
- Bounded complexity justifies cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma
- Cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma
- Finite Rationality and Interpersonal Complexity in Repeated Games
- Finite automata play a repeated extensive game
- Finite automata play the repeated prisoner's dilemma
- On complexity as bounded rationality (extended abstract)
- On players with a bounded number of states
- Program equilibrium
- Rationality, Computability, and Nash Equilibrium
- Repeated games with finite automata
- Repeated games, finite automata, and complexity
- Simplicity of beliefs and delay tactics in a concession game
- Some notes on Church's thesis and the theory of games
- Testing threats in repeated games
- The Structure of Nash Equilibrium in Repeated Games with Finite Automata
- The complexity of computing a best response automaton in repeated games with mixed strategies
- The complexity of computing best-response automata in repeated games
Cited in
(7)- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 592681 (Why is no real title available?)
- Simplicity of beliefs and delay tactics in a concession game
- Directed graphical structure, Nash equilibrium, and potential games
- Bounded rationality. A Simon-like explication
- Implementation in adaptive better-response dynamics: towards a general theory of bounded rationality in mechanisms
- Algorithmic rationality: game theory with costly computation
- Complexity of games and bounded rationality
This page was built for publication: Bounded rationality, strategy simplification, and equilibrium
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q361802)