Implementing equal division with an ultimatum threat

DOI10.1007/S11238-013-9394-ZMaRDI QIDQ490057zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Esat Doruk Cetemen, Emin Karagözoğlu

Publication date 21 January 2015

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://hdl.handle.net/11693/12852

zbMATH Keywords

arbitrationdivide the dollar gameequal divisionimplementationsubgame perfect Nash equilibriumultimatum game

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

2-person games (91A05) (n)-person games, (n>2) (91A06) Other game-theoretic models (91A40) Resource and cost allocation (including fair division, apportionment, etc.) (91B32)

Recommendations

• Equitable allocation of divisible goods
• Fair division of indivisible items
• How to obtain an equitable optimal fair division
• Fair division with uncertain needs
• Fair (and not so fair) division
• The efficiency of fair division
• On fair division for indivisible items
• Compromising between the proportional and equal division values
• Divide and compromise

Cites work

• A non-cooperative support for equal division in estate division problems
• A social choice rule and its implementation in perfect equilibrium
• An evolutionary model of bargaining
• Divide the dollar: Three solutions and extensions
• Divide-the-dollar game revisited
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4207369 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 49749 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3614533 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1015852 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1549895 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2216492 (Why is no real title available?)
• Implementation of the Nash solution based on its Walrasian characterization
• Mixed-strategy equilibria in the Nash demand game
• On the origin of convention: Evidence from symmetric bargaining games
• Subgame-perfect implementation of bargaining solutions.
• Two-person bargaining: An experimental test of the Nash axioms
• Two-Person Cooperative Games

Cited in

(11)

• Implementing egalitarianism in a class of Nash demand games
• Implementing a surplus division rule
• Reasonable Nash demand games
• Punishing greediness in divide-the-dollar games
• (In)efficiency and equitability of equilibrium outcomes in a family of bargaining games
• A minimally altruistic refinement of Nash equilibrium
• Divide-the-dollar game revisited
• Ultimatum bargaining with envy under incomplete information
• Multilateral bargaining over the division of losses
• Using ultimatum power as a leverage in resolving a bargaining conflict
• Rewarding moderate behavior in a dynamic Nash demand game

This page was built for publication: Implementing equal division with an ultimatum threat

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q490057)