An Analysis of Simple Voting Systems for Electing Committees
From MaRDI portal
Cited in
(21)- The Condorcet criterion and committee selection
- Strategy-proof consensus rules for committee elections.
- A social choice approach to ordinal group activity selection
- Coincidence of Condorcet committees
- Axiomatic characterization of committee scoring rules
- When are committees of Condorcet winners Condorcet winning committees?
- Electing a committee with dominance constraints
- Condorcet winning sets
- On stable rules for selecting committees
- Multiwinner analogues of the plurality rule: axiomatic and algorithmic perspectives
- Properties of multiwinner voting rules
- Does choosing committees from approval balloting fulfill the electorate's will?
- It is difficult to tell if there is a Condorcet spanning tree
- How hard is it to tell which is a Condorcet committee?
- Voting and vagueness
- Popular spanning trees
- Gehrlein stable committee with multi-modal preferences
- Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates
- Multi-winner rules analogous to the plurality rule
- Social acceptability of Condorcet committees
- On the rule of \(k\) names
This page was built for publication: An Analysis of Simple Voting Systems for Electing Committees
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3926312)
