Intention or request: the impact of message structures
Summary: This paper investigates how different message structures impact communication strategy as well as sender and receiver behavior. Specifically, we focus on comparing communication games with messages stating an intention versus a request. Our experimental results show that when a game includes self-signaling or self-committing messages, the two message structures yield negligibly different results. However, when the messages of the game are neither self-signaling nor self-committing, we find that more subjects send messages suggesting cooperation with request than intention. Interestingly, subjects also deviate from their suggested actions more frequently with request than intention. We surmise lying aversion plays a prominent role in contributing to the differences in games where messages lack the self-committing property.
- How does communication affect beliefs in one-shot games with complete information?
- Demanding or deferring? An experimental analysis of the economic value of communication with attitude
- Experiments on communication in games: introduction to the special issue
- ``I'm just a soul whose intentions are good: the role of communication in noisy repeated games
- Cheap talk games with two-senders and different modes of communication
- A model of pre-game communication
- Bare promises: an experiment
- Communication, coordination and Nash equilibrium
- Do actions speak louder than words? An experimental comparison of observation and cheap talk
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 903638 (Why is no real title available?)
- Meaning and credibility in cheap-talk games
- Promises and Partnership
- Self-serving cheap talk: a test of Aumann's conjecture
- Strategic communication with lying costs
- Strategic Information Transmission
- The effects of costless pre-play communication: experimental evidence from games with Pareto-ranked equilibria
- What makes cheap talk effective? Experimental evidence
- When are Nash equilibria self-enforcing? An experimental analysis
- Words, Deeds, and Lies: Strategic Behaviour in Games with Multiple Signals
This page was built for publication: Intention or request: the impact of message structures
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2052492)