Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting
DOI10.1007/S00355-020-01300-ZzbMATH Open1480.91091OpenAlexW3081990856MaRDI QIDQ2235100FDOQ2235100
Authors: Antoinette Baujard, Herrade Igersheim, Isabelle Lebon 
Publication date: 20 October 2021
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-020-01300-z
Recommendations
- A live experiment on approval voting
- On the Condorcet efficiency of evaluative voting (and other voting rules) with trichotomous preferences
- Two field experiments on approval voting in Germany
- Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting
- Dis\&approval voting: a characterization
History, political science (91F10) Voting theory (91B12) Experimental work for problems pertaining to game theory, economics, and finance (91-05)
Cites Work
- Social choice and individual values
- Relative Utilitarianism
- Comparison of scoring rules in Poisson voting games
- Preference intensity representation: strategic overstating in large elections
- Dis\&approval voting: a characterization
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Formal utilitarianism and range voting
- A general scoring rule
- A `threshold aggregation' of three-graded rankings
- Voter turnout as a participation game: An experimental investigation
- Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting
- Why votes have value: instrumental voting with overconfidence and overestimation of others' errors
- Dilemma with approval and disapproval votes
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2235100)
