Preference intensity representation: strategic overstating in large elections
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2247953
DOI10.1007/s00355-013-0728-0zbMath1291.91066MaRDI QIDQ2247953
Jean-François Laslier, Matías Núñez
Publication date: 30 June 2014
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-013-0728-0
91B12: Voting theory
Related Items
Multiple votes, multiple candidacies and polarization, Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rules, Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting, Characterising scoring rules by their solution in iteratively undominated strategies, Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting, Formal utilitarianism and range voting, The strategic sincerity of approval voting
Cites Work
- Handbook on approval voting
- A general scoring rule
- A note on the tight simplification of mechanisms
- On the informational efficiency of simple scoring rules
- A theory of voting in large elections
- Simplified mechanisms with an application to sponsored-search auctions
- Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games
- Large Poisson games
- Comparison of scoring rules in Poisson voting games
- Interpretation of electoral mixed strategies
- Sophisticated voting and equilibrium refinements under plurality rule
- Framed Field Experiments on Approval Voting: Lessons from the 2002 and 2007 French Presidential Elections
- One Person, Many Votes: Divided Majority and Information Aggregation
- Social Choice Scoring Functions
- Impartiality: Definition and Representation
- Relative Utilitarianism
- Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate