Costly information acquisition. Is it better to toss a coin?

DOI10.1016/j.geb.2013.07.008zbMath1282.91093MaRDI QIDQ2437813

Matteo Triossi

Publication date: 13 March 2014

Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.07.008

zbMATH Keywords

heterogeneity; endogenous information acquisition; Condorcet's jury theorem

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

91B12: Voting theory

Related Items

Voluntary voting: costs and benefits, Pretrial beliefs and verdict accuracy: costly juror effort and free riding, Appointed learning for the common good: optimal committee size and monetary transfers, The Condorcet jury theorem with information acquisition

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Voluntary voting: costs and benefits
• Rational ignorance and voting behavior
• Condorcet's jury theorem in light of de Finetti's theorem. Majority-rule voting with correlated votes
• Condorcet's jury theorem, dependency among jurors
• Extended Poisson games and the Condorcet jury theorem
• Stay away from fair coins: a Condorcet jury theorem
• Rational choice and the Condorcet jury theorem
• Deliberative voting
• When is Condorcet's jury theorem valid?
• Would rational voters acquire costly information?
• Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections With Private Information
• Aggregating Information by Voting: The Wisdom of the Experts versus the Wisdom of the Masses
• Committee Design with Endogenous Information
• A Measure of Asymptotic Efficiency for Tests of a Hypothesis Based on the sum of Observations