AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks

DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2010.05.004zbMath1211.68433arXiv1810.04886WikidataQ57499569 ScholiaQ57499569MaRDI QIDQ622279

Federico Cerutti, Giovanni Guida, Massimiliano Giacomin, Pietro Baroni

Publication date: 31 January 2011

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04886

zbMATH Keywords

argumentation semantics; argumentation frameworks; argument attack relation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

68T37: Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence

Related Items

On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach, RAFDivider  : a distributed algorithm for computing semantics in higher-order abstract argumentation frameworks, Theoretical analysis and implementation of abstract argumentation frameworks with domain assignments, AFRA, Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems, On the input/output behavior of argumentation frameworks, Algorithms for decision problems in argument systems under preferred semantics, On the resolution-based family of abstract argumentation semantics and its grounded instance, A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation, An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support, Arguing about informant credibility in open multi-agent systems, Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations, Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches, A logic of argumentation for specification and verification of abstract argumentation frameworks, A socio-cognitive model of trust using argumentation theory, Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks, Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees, Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view, Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey, Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding, A general approach to extension-based semantics in abstract argumentation, Handling support cycles and collective interactions in the logical encoding of higher-order bipolar argumentation frameworks, A multi attack argumentation framework

Uses Software

• ASPARTIX

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics
• An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
• Audiences in argumentation frameworks
• On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview
• Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques
• Fibring argumentation frames
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• An Abstract Theory of Argumentation That Accommodates Defeasible Reasoning About Preferences
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• On the Meta-logic of Arguments
• Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
• Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks