On inference from inconsistent premisses

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 05:10, 3 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:2544606

DOI10.1007/BF00154005zbMath0212.31103OpenAlexW2013788787MaRDI QIDQ2544606

Ruth Manor, Nicholas Rescher

Publication date: 1970

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00154005




Related Items (69)

A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentationA generic framework to include belief functions in preference handling and multi-criteria decisionAn adaptive logic based on Jaśkowski's approach to paraconsistencyAdaptive logic characterizations of input/output logicActive logic semantics for a single agent in a static worldA methodological shift in favor of (some) paraconsistency in the sciencesQualitative capacities: basic notions and potential applicationsPossibilistic logic: a retrospective and prospective viewAn argumentation system for defeasible reasoningRanking of fuzzy intervals seen through the imprecise probabilistic lensLogic-based argumentation with existential rulesLogical limits of abstract argumentation frameworksThe inapplicability of (selected) paraconsistent logicsOn a paraconsistentization functor in the category of consequence structuresPROBABILISTIC ENTAILMENT ON FIRST ORDER LANGUAGES AND REASONING WITH INCONSISTENCIESBeing Consistent About Inconsistency: Toward the Rational Fusing of Inconsistent Propositional Logic BasesRevising LogicsSelecting accepted assertions in partially ordered inconsistent DL-Lite knowledge basesOn the measure of conflicts: Shapley inconsistency valuesSimple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworksExtending Removed Sets Revision to partially preordered belief basesAn evidence logic perspective on Schotch-Jennings forcingLogical argumentation by dynamic proof systemsA postulate-driven study of logical argumentationUnified deductive systems: an outlineA capacity-based semantics for inconsistency-tolerant inferencesClassical logic, argument and dialecticOn the structure of dialectical reasoning in the social and policy sciencesSolving conflicts in information merging by a flexible interpretation of atomic propositionsA curious dialogical logic and its composition problemKeeping Globally Inconsistent Scientific Theories Locally ConsistentParaconsistent orbits of logicsDeductive argumentation by enhanced sequent calculi and dynamic derivationsProbabilities with gaps and glutsInformation Fusion and Revision in Qualitative and Quantitative SettingsNew Arguments for Adaptive Logics as Unifying Frame for the Defeasible Handling of InconsistencyAn adaptive logic for relevant classical deductionAssessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theoriesA capacity-based framework encompassing Belnap-Dunn logic for reasoning about multisource informationInconsistency as qualified truth: a probability logic approachLogic based mergingA dynamic characterization of the pure logic of relevant implicationA logic-based theory of deductive argumentsA procedural criterion for final derivability in inconsistency-adaptive logicsA generalized proof-theoretic approach to logical argumentation based on hypersequentsMeasures of inconsistency and defaultsReasoning under inconsistency: a forgetting-based approachAn argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge basesCombining Imprecise Probability Masses with Maximal Coherent Subsets: Application to Ensemble ClassificationA review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistencyAdaptive Proofs for Networks of Partial StructuresOn the Methodology of Paraconsistent LogicEMIL: extracting meaning from inconsistent language. Towards argumentation using a controlled natural language interfaceApproximate coherence-based reasoningComplexity and Cautiousness Results for Reasoning from Partially Preordered Belief BasesYes fellows, most human reasoning is complexWays things can't beDirect Dynamic Proofs for the Rescher–Manor Consequence Relations: The Flat CaseA new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworksA simple signed system for paraconsistent reasoningTutorial on Inconsistency-Adaptive LogicsBeyond contradiction and consistency: a design for a dialectical policy systemThe theory of the process of explanation generalized to include the inconsistent caseReasoning, nonmonotonicity and learning in connectionist networks that capture propositional knowledgeParaconsistent inference relations induced from inconsistency measuresGetting the most out of inconsistencyRich preference-based argumentation frameworks\(\text{DA}^2\) merging operatorsMeasuring inconsistency







This page was built for publication: On inference from inconsistent premisses