How to consult an expert? Opinion versus evidence
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2430003
DOI10.1007/S11238-009-9177-8zbMATH Open1209.91042OpenAlexW2025868483MaRDI QIDQ2430003FDOQ2430003
Authors: Thomas Lanzi, Jérôme Mathis 
Publication date: 5 April 2011
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://publications.ut-capitole.fr/936/1/mathis_2010-01.pdf
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Strategic Information Transmission
- Robust inference in communication games with partial provability
- Strategic Information Revelation
- D1 signaling equilibria with multiple signals and a continuum of types
- Full revelation of information in sender-receiver games of persuasion
- Strategic Information Transmission with Verifiable Messages
- Debates and decisions: On a rationale of argumentation rules.
- The burden of proof in a game of persuasion
- On Optimal Rules of Persuasion
- Consulting an expert with potentially conflicting preferences
- Secrecy, two-sided bias and the value of evidence
- Information transmission when the sender's preferences are uncertain.
- Persuasion games with higher-order uncertainty.
Cited In (13)
- The value of uncertainty in determining an expert's source of expertise
- How to use expert advice
- How to better use expert advice
- Cheap talk with multiple experts and uncertain biases
- On comparison of non-Bayesian experts
- Handling uncertainty when getting contradictory advice from experts
- Court‐appointed experts and accuracy in adversarial litigation
- Conflicting evidence and decisions by agency professionals: an experimental test in the context of Merger regulation
- A model of expertise
- Talking to influence
- Does consultation improve decision-making?
- Consulting an expert with potentially conflicting preferences
- Title not available (Why is that?)
This page was built for publication: How to consult an expert? Opinion versus evidence
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2430003)
