Exploiting polyhedral symmetries in social choice

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2452242

DOI10.1007/S00355-012-0667-1zbMATH Open1288.91076arXiv1109.1545OpenAlexW2091420732MaRDI QIDQ2452242FDOQ2452242


Authors: Achill Schürmann Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 2 June 2014

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A large amount of literature in social choice theory deals with quantifying the probability of certain election outcomes. One way of computing the probability of a specific voting situation under the Impartial Anonymous Culture assumption is via counting integral points in polyhedra. Here, Ehrhart theory can help, but unfortunately the dimension and complexity of the involved polyhedra grows rapidly with the number of candidates. However, if we exploit available polyhedral symmetries, some computations become possible that previously were infeasible. We show this in three well known examples: Condorcet's paradox, Condorcet efficiency of plurality voting and in Plurality voting vs Plurality Runoff.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.1545




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (20)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Exploiting polyhedral symmetries in social choice

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2452242)