Utility proportional beliefs

DOI10.1007/S00182-013-0409-3zbMath1308.91034OpenAlexW2022644461MaRDI QIDQ480852

Andrés Perea, Christian W. Bach

Publication date: 12 December 2014

Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-013-0409-3

zbMATH Keywords

algorithmsinteractive epistemologyepistemic game theorysolution conceptstraveler's dilemmautility proportional beliefs

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26) Utility theory for games (91A30)

Related Items (5)

Common belief in approximate rationality ⋮ Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: the quantal hierarchy model of decision making ⋮ How much does it help to know what she knows you know? An agent-based simulation study ⋮ Beyond coincidence: the reasoning process underlying utility proportional beliefs process ⋮ Introduction to the special Section on logic and the foundations of game and decision theory (LOFT12)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• An algorithm for proper rationalizability
• The Bayesian foundations of solution concepts of games
• A bounded-rationality approach to the study of noncooperative games
• Agreeing to disagree
• Proper rationalizability in lexicographic beliefs
• Quantal response equilibria for normal form games
• Proper rationalizability and backward induction
• A one-person doxastic characterization of Nash strategies
• Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection
• Rationalizable Strategic Behavior
• Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality
• Rationalizability and Correlated Equilibria
• Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model

This page was built for publication: Utility proportional beliefs