Utility proportional beliefs
DOI10.1007/S00182-013-0409-3zbMATH Open1308.91034OpenAlexW2022644461MaRDI QIDQ480852FDOQ480852
Authors: Christian W. Bach, Andres Perea
Publication date: 12 December 2014
Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-013-0409-3
Recommendations
- Beyond coincidence: the reasoning process underlying utility proportional beliefs process
- Common belief and the theory of games with perfect information
- Proper belief revision and equilibrium in dynamic games
- Common belief in rationality in psychological games. Belief-dependent utility and the limits of strategic reasoning
- "Beliefs about Beliefs" without Probabilities
algorithmsepistemic game theoryinteractive epistemologysolution conceptstraveler's dilemmautility proportional beliefs
Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42) Rationality and learning in game theory (91A26) Utility theory for games (91A30)
Cites Work
- Quantal response equilibria for normal form games
- Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model
- The Bayesian foundations of solution concepts of games
- Agreeing to disagree
- Proper rationalizability in lexicographic beliefs
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior
- Rationalizability and Correlated Equilibria
- A bounded-rationality approach to the study of noncooperative games
- Proper rationalizability and backward induction
- A one-person doxastic characterization of Nash strategies
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An algorithm for proper rationalizability
Cited In (6)
- Introduction to the special Section on logic and the foundations of game and decision theory (LOFT12)
- Beyond coincidence: the reasoning process underlying utility proportional beliefs process
- Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: the quantal hierarchy model of decision making
- Common belief in approximate rationality
- Common belief in rationality in psychological games. Belief-dependent utility and the limits of strategic reasoning
- How much does it help to know what she knows you know? An agent-based simulation study
This page was built for publication: Utility proportional beliefs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q480852)