Finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma experiments without a commonly known end
From MaRDI portal
Publication:662273
DOI10.1007/S00182-011-0272-ZzbMath1232.91098OpenAlexW2066052412MaRDI QIDQ662273
Lisa V. Bruttel, Ulrich Kamecke, Güth, Werner
Publication date: 22 February 2012
Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-011-0272-z
Related Items (4)
Three steps ahead ⋮ The impact of the termination rule on cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma experiment ⋮ Fairness Norms Can Explain the Emergence of Specific Cooperation Norms in the Battle of the Prisoner's Dilemma ⋮ Revealed reputations in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Infinity in the lab. How do people play repeated games?
- The impact of the termination rule on cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma experiment
- Finite automata play the repeated prisoner's dilemma
- A non-equilibrium analysis of the finitely-repeated prisoner's dilemma
- Two-person bargaining behavior in fixed discounting factors games with infinite horizon
- Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity
- When does the game end? Public goods experiments with non-definite and non-commonly known time horizons
- Finitely Repeated Games
- Duopoly Strategies Programmed by Experienced Players
- Cooperation in Repeated Games When the Number of Stages is not Commonly Known
This page was built for publication: Finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma experiments without a commonly known end