Is having a unique equilibrium robust?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:952688

DOI10.1016/J.JMATECO.2007.06.008zbMATH Open1152.91007arXiv0902.2771OpenAlexW3099302628MaRDI QIDQ952688FDOQ952688


Authors: Yannick Viossat Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 13 November 2008

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We investigate whether having a unique equilibrium (or a given number of equilibria) is robust to perturbation of the payoffs, both for Nash equilibrium and correlated equilibrium. We show that the set of n-player finite games with a unique correlated equilibrium is open, while this is not true of Nash equilibrium for n>2. The crucial lemma is that a unique correlated equilibrium is a quasi-strict Nash equilibrium. Related results are studied. For instance, we show that generic two-person zero-sum games have a unique correlated equilibrium and that, while the set of symmetric bimatrix games with a unique symmetric Nash equilibrium is not open, the set of symmetric bimatrix games with a unique and quasi-strict symmetric Nash equilibrium is.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0902.2771




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (7)





This page was built for publication: Is having a unique equilibrium robust?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q952688)