Behavioral Identification in Coalitional Bargaining: An Experimental Analysis of Demand Bargaining and Alternating Offers

From MaRDI portal
Revision as of 02:10, 9 February 2024 by Import240129110113 (talk | contribs) (Created automatically from import240129110113)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Publication:5393921

DOI10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00641.xzbMath1152.91459OpenAlexW2118622061MaRDI QIDQ5393921

Massimo Morelli, John H. Kagel, Guillaume R. Fréchette

Publication date: 24 October 2006

Published in: Econometrica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00641.x



Related Items

Gambler's fallacy and imperfect best response in legislative bargaining, A model of protocoalition bargaining with breakdown probability, An adaptive model of demand adjustment in weighted majority games, Too big to prevail: the paradox of power in coalition formation, Legislative bargaining with heterogeneous disagreement values: theory and experiments, The dynamics of distributive politics, Pork versus public goods: an experimental study of public good provision within a legislative bargaining framework, An experiment on demand commitment bargaining, An experiment on the Nash program: a comparison of two strategic mechanisms implementing the Shapley value, Meaningful learning in weighted voting games: an experiment, Demand bargaining and proportional payoffs in majority games, How do coalitions get built? Evidence from an extensive form coalition game with and without communication, Legislative bargaining with teams, Dynamic legislative bargaining with veto power: theory and experiments, Demand commitments in majority bargaining or how formateurs get their way, Agenda control as a cheap talk game: theory and experiments with storable votes, Omnibus or not: package bills and single-issue bills in a legislative bargaining game, Veto power in committees: An experimental study, Gaining power through enlargement: strategic foundations and experimental evidence, Power illusion in coalitional bargaining: an experimental analysis, Coalitional bargaining games: a new concept of value and coalition formation