Control of Condorcet voting: complexity and a relation-algebraic approach
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3929034 (Why is no real title available?)
- Anyone but him: the complexity of precluding an alternative
- Automated verification of relational while-programs
- Challenges to complexity shields that are supposed to protect elections against manipulation and control: a survey
- Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing
- Computing and visualizing Banks sets of dominance relations using relation algebra and RelView
- Computing the minimal covering set
- Computing tournament solutions using relation algebra and RelView
- Exact analysis of Dodgson elections
- Exact complexity of the winner problem for Young elections
- Extending Condorcet's rule
- How hard is it to control an election?
- Llull and Copeland Voting Computationally Resist Bribery and Constructive Control
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- Single transferable vote resists strategic voting
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
- Tournament solutions and majority voting
- When are elections with few candidates hard to manipulate?
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Control of Condorcet voting: complexity and a relation-algebraic approach
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q319803)