Incentive mechanism design for production economies with both private and public ownerships
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1592728
DOI10.1006/game.1999.0777zbMath1047.91045OpenAlexW2127763530MaRDI QIDQ1592728
Publication date: 2000
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://semanticscholar.org/paper/0fd697cd53b896017c06ada99da7cfc658a14eef
Production theory, theory of the firm (91B38) Special types of economic markets (including Cournot, Bertrand) (91B54)
Related Items
Triple implementation by sharing mechanisms in production economies with unequal labor skills ⋮ A solution to the problem of consumption externalities. ⋮ Mechanism design for a solution to the tragedy of commons ⋮ The unique informational efficiency of the competitive mechanism in economies with production ⋮ Nash implementation in production economies with unequal skills: a characterization
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Cost share equilibria: a Lindahlian approach
- Implementation of the Walrasian correspondence without continuous, convex, and ordered preferences
- The ratio equilibrium and a voting game in a public goods economy
- Undominated Nash implementation in bounded mechanisms
- An implementable state-ownership system with general variable returns
- Nash implementation in production economies
- The proportional solution for economies with both private and public ownership
- Continuous and feasible implementation of rational-expectations Lindahl allocations
- Continuous implementation of constrained rational expectations equilibria
- Outcome Functions Yielding Walrasian and Lindahl Allocations at Nash Equilibrium Points
- Implementation of the Lindahl Correspondence by a Single-Valued, Feasible, and Continuous Mechanism
- Walrasian Analysis via Strategic Outcome Functions
- Feasible and Continuous Implementation
