Condorcet's paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: Different perspectives on balanced preferences
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1863926
DOI10.1023/A:1015551010381zbMath1030.91500MaRDI QIDQ1863926
Publication date: 12 March 2003
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Related Items (22)
An analytical and experimental comparison of maximal lottery schemes ⋮ Similarity Suppresses Cyclicity: Why Similar Competitors Form Hierarchies ⋮ Population of entities with three individual states and asymmetric interactions ⋮ How to choose a president, mayor, chair: Balinski and Laraki unpacked ⋮ When ties are possible: weak Condorcet winners and Arrovian rationality ⋮ On the likelihood of single-peaked preferences ⋮ Developing the aggregate empirical side of computational social choice ⋮ The probability of intransitivity in dice and close elections ⋮ The effectiveness of weighted scoring rules when pairwise majority rule cycles exist. ⋮ Complexities of electing diverse committees ⋮ Robustness against inefficient manipulation ⋮ Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis ⋮ Signal extraction for simulated games with a large number of players ⋮ Random preorders and alignments ⋮ The impact of indifferent voters on the likelihood of some voting paradoxes ⋮ The sensitivity of weight selection for scoring rules to profile proximity to single-peaked preferences ⋮ Voting-based ensemble learning for partial lexicographic preference forests over combinatorial domains ⋮ On the stability of a triplet of scoring rules ⋮ The welfare consequences of strategic voting in two commonly used parliamentary agendas ⋮ The effect of unconditional preferences on Sen's paradox ⋮ Confidence and varieties of bias ⋮ Which scoring rule maximizes condorcet efficiency under IAC?
This page was built for publication: Condorcet's paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: Different perspectives on balanced preferences
