Intransitive social indifference and the Arrow dilemma

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2254232

DOI10.1007/s10058-014-0158-1zbMath1329.91038OpenAlexW2074964373WikidataQ56114303 ScholiaQ56114303MaRDI QIDQ2254232

Allan F. Gibbard

Publication date: 4 February 2015

Published in: Review of Economic Design (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-014-0158-1




Related Items

On the structure of fuzzy social welfare functionsFuzzy preferences and social choiceCharacterization of monotonicity and neutrality for binary Paretian social decision rulesIndecisive choice theoryManipulation of nonimposed, nonoligarchic, nonbinary group decision rulesA foundation for Pareto optimalityArrow's decisive coalitionsCollective choice rules with social maximalityOn some oligarchy results when social preference is fuzzyPlural identities and preference formationSocial evaluation functionals with an arbitrary set of alternativesChoice procedures and power structure in social decisionsA note on Murakami's theorems and incomplete social choice without the Pareto principleConditions on social-preference cyclesStructure of neutral and monotonic binary social decision rules with quasi-transitive individual preferencesRationality and aggregation of preferences in an ordinally fuzzy frameworkFactoring fuzzy transitivityAggregation of binary evaluations with abstentionsImpossibility theorems without collective rationalitySen's proofs of the Arrow and Gibbard theoremsAllan GibbardThe Arrow paradox with fuzzy preferencesSophisticated preference aggregationCan equity be purchased at the expense of efficiency? An axiomatic inquiryRationality, path independence, and the power structureImpossibility results for choice correspondencesWeak strategy proofness: The case of nonbinary social choice functionsTheory and applications of financial chaos index



Cites Work