Behavioral Identification in Coalitional Bargaining: An Experimental Analysis of Demand Bargaining and Alternating Offers
From MaRDI portal
Publication:5393921
DOI10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00641.xzbMath1152.91459MaRDI QIDQ5393921
Massimo Morelli, John H. Kagel, Guillaume R. Fréchette
Publication date: 24 October 2006
Published in: Econometrica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00641.x
91A12: Cooperative games
91B12: Voting theory
91B26: Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models
Related Items
An experiment on demand commitment bargaining, An experiment on the Nash program: a comparison of two strategic mechanisms implementing the Shapley value, Gambler's fallacy and imperfect best response in legislative bargaining, The dynamics of distributive politics, Pork versus public goods: an experimental study of public good provision within a legislative bargaining framework, How do coalitions get built? Evidence from an extensive form coalition game with and without communication, Legislative bargaining with teams, Demand commitments in majority bargaining or how formateurs get their way, Agenda control as a cheap talk game: theory and experiments with storable votes, Omnibus or not: package bills and single-issue bills in a legislative bargaining game, Demand bargaining and proportional payoffs in majority games, Veto power in committees: An experimental study, Gaining power through enlargement: strategic foundations and experimental evidence, A model of protocoalition bargaining with breakdown probability, Legislative bargaining with heterogeneous disagreement values: theory and experiments, Meaningful learning in weighted voting games: an experiment, Dynamic legislative bargaining with veto power: theory and experiments, Coalitional bargaining games: a new concept of value and coalition formation, Power illusion in coalitional bargaining: an experimental analysis, An adaptive model of demand adjustment in weighted majority games, Too big to prevail: the paradox of power in coalition formation