Endogenizing the sticks and carrots: modeling possible perverse effects of counterterrorism measures
From MaRDI portal
Publication:646633
DOI10.1007/S10479-010-0833-8zbMATH Open1237.91182OpenAlexW1973977385MaRDI QIDQ646633FDOQ646633
Authors: Vicki M. Bier, Kjell Hausken
Publication date: 17 November 2011
Published in: Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-010-0833-8
Recommendations
- Incentive Stackelberg Strategies for a Dynamic Game on Terrorism
- Strategic deterrence of terrorist attacks
- Optimizing counter-terror operations: should one fight fire with ``fire or ``water?
- The path of terror attacks
- Terror and counterterror operations: Differential game with cyclical Nash solution
Cites Work
Cited In (12)
- A review of attacker-defender games: current state and paths forward
- Governmental combat of the dynamics of multiple competing terrorist organizations
- Carrots, sticks and fog during insurgencies
- Governments playing games and combating the dynamics of a terrorist organization
- Why direct counter‐terrorism measures only may fail: An analysis of direct and preventive counter‐terrorism measures
- National security vs. human rights: a game theoretic analysis of the tension between these objectives
- The ``six-element analysis method for the research on the characteristics of terrorist activities
- Principal-agent theory, game theory, and the precautionary principle
- On the learning patterns and adaptive behavior of terrorist organizations
- The path of terror attacks
- The refugee game: the relationship between individual security expenditures and collective security
- Terrorism deterrence in a two country framework: strategic interactions between R\&D, defense and pre-emption
This page was built for publication: Endogenizing the sticks and carrots: modeling possible perverse effects of counterterrorism measures
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q646633)