Level r consensus and stable social choice
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments
- A dictionary for voting paradoxes
- Chaotic elections! A mathematician looks at voting
- Condorcet Social Choice Functions
- Explaining all three-alternative voting outcomes
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1897331 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3361657 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3405712 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inverted orders for monotone scoring rules
- Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes. I: Pairwise votes
- More on the Preservation of Preference Proximity and Anonymous Social Choice
- NON-NULL RANKING MODELS. I
- On the selection of the same winner by all scoring rules
- Preference Proximity and Anonymous Social Choice
- Social compromise and social metrics
- Some general results on the metric rationalization for social decision rules
- Some measures of closeness to unanimity and their implications
- The Borda Rule and Pareto Stability: A Comment
- The ultimate of chaos resulting from weighted voting systems
Cited in
(6)- Flexible level-1 consensus ensuring stable social choice: analysis and algorithms
- Does avoiding bad voting rules result in good ones?
- Pairwise consensus and the Borda rule
- On one class of non-local aggregation rules
- On stable solutions to the ordinal social choice problem
- Social acceptability of Condorcet committees
This page was built for publication: Level \(r\) consensus and stable social choice
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q904833)