Explaining all three-alternative voting outcomes

DOI10.1006/JETH.1999.2541MaRDI QIDQ1806204zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Donald G. Saari

Publication date 20 December 1999

Published in Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://semanticscholar.org/paper/4d67be3323079a62d0ddab393816c85926b19fcb

zbMATH Keywords

Condorcet winnerpreference aggregation paradoxesvoting outcomes

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Voting theory (91B12)

Recommendations

• Connecting pairwise and positional election outcomes
• Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes. I: Pairwise votes
• Mathematical structure of voting paradoxes. II: Positional voting
• Chaotic elections! A mathematician looks at voting

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3148878 (Why is no real title available?)
• A Borda measure for social choice functions
• A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions
• A chaotic Exploration of Aggregation Paradoxes
• A dictionary for voting paradoxes
• A general possibility theorem for group decision rules with Pareto- transitivity
• Basic Geometry of Voting
• Connecting and resolving Sen's and Arrow's theorems
• Copeland method. II: Manipulation, monotonicity, and paradoxes
• Dictionaries of Paradoxes for Statistical Tests on k Samples
• Excess demand functions
• General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models
• Geometry of voting
• Informational geometry of social choice
• Intransitivities in multidimensional spatial voting: Period three implies chaos
• Mathematical complexity of simple economics.
• Millions of election outcomes from a single profile
• Social choice and individual values
• The Borda dictionary
• The Borda method is most likely to respect the Condorcet principle
• The Copeland method. I: Relationships and the dictionary
• The aggregated excess demand function and other aggregation procedures
• The likelihood of dubious election outcomes
• The voters' paradox, spin, and the Borda count

Cited in

(30)

• Frequency based analysis of collective aggregation rules
• Another perspective on Borda's paradox
• On the model dependence of majority preference relations reconstructed from ballot or survey data
• Adopting a Plurality Vote Perspective
• On removing Condorcet effects from pairwise election tallies
• Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?
• Developments in the theory of randomized shortest paths with a comparison of graph node distances
• Representation theory of the symmetric group in voting theory and game theory
• A three-dimensional voting system in Hong Kong
• Likelihood of voting outcomes with generalized IAC probabilities
• Systematic analysis of multiple voting rules
• A dictionary for voting paradoxes
• The Borda rule and the pairwise-majority-loser revisited
• Level \(r\) consensus and stable social choice
• The scorix: a popular representation of votes revisited
• Connecting pairwise and positional election outcomes
• Basis for binary comparisons and non-standard probabilities
• A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments
• Decomposition behavior in aggregated data sets
• Plurality rule works in three-candidate elections
• Scoring rules and social choice properties: some characterizations
• Representations of votes based on pairwise information: monotonicity versus consistency
• One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness
• Consequences of reversing preferences
• The profile structure for Luce's choice axiom
• Unifying voting theory from Nakamura's to Greenberg's theorems
• The supercovering relation, the pairwise winner, and more missing links between Borda and Condorcet
• Complexity and the geometry of voting
• Stagewise learning for noisy \(k\)-ary preferences
• The effectiveness of weighted scoring rules when pairwise majority rule cycles exist.

This page was built for publication: Explaining all three-alternative voting outcomes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1806204)