One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness
From MaRDI portal
Publication:532698
DOI10.1007/s00182-009-0170-9zbMath1211.91111OpenAlexW2038238590WikidataQ56457257 ScholiaQ56457257MaRDI QIDQ532698
M. Remzi Sanver, William S. Zwicker
Publication date: 5 May 2011
Published in: International Journal of Game Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-009-0170-9
monotonicityno-show paradoxstrategy-proofnessscoring rulemanipulationparticipationCondorcet extensionone-way monotonicitysensible virtue
Related Items
Characterizing the resolute part of monotonic social choice correspondences, Proxy selection in transitive proxy voting, The expanding approvals rule: improving proportional representation and monotonicity, Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity, Optimal bounds for the no-show paradox via SAT solving, Voting with rubber bands, weights, and strings, Unnamed Item, Monotonicity properties and their adaptation to irresolute social choice rules, Welfare maximization entices participation, Condorcet's principle and the strong no-show paradoxes, Recovering non-monotonicity problems of voting rules, Strategy-proofness of the plurality rule over restricted domains
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Consistency of decision processes
- Concorcet's principle implies the no show paradox
- Monotonicity paradoxes in the theory of elections
- The voters' paradox, spin, and the Borda count
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
- Copeland method. II: Manipulation, monotonicity, and paradoxes
- Explaining all three-alternative voting outcomes
- Borda rule, Copeland method and strategic manipulation.
- Manipulability measures of common social choice functions
- Some further results on the manipulability of social choice rules
- Minimal monotonic extensions of scoring rules
- Non-monotonicity does not imply the no-show paradox
- Consequences of reversing preferences
- Paradoxes of Preferential Voting
- Implementation Via Nash Equilibria
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- Condorcet Social Choice Functions
- Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality
- Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate