| Publication | Date of Publication | Type |
|---|
Classification aggregation without unanimity
Mathematical Social Sciences | 2024-06-03 | Paper |
Uniform random dictatorship: a characterization without strategy-proofness
Economics Letters | 2023-09-12 | Paper |
Compromising as an equal loss principle
Review of Economic Design | 2023-08-16 | Paper |
Monotonicity violations under plurality with a runoff: the case of French presidential elections
Social Choice and Welfare | 2022-09-09 | Paper |
The relationship between Arrow's and Wilson's theorems on restricted domains
Mathematical Social Sciences | 2022-01-24 | Paper |
Correction to: ``Anonymous, neutral, and resolute social choice revisited
Social Choice and Welfare | 2021-12-10 | Paper |
Anonymous, neutral, and resolute social choice revisited
Social Choice and Welfare | 2021-12-10 | Paper |
An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation
Social Choice and Welfare | 2021-12-10 | Paper |
Recovering non-monotonicity problems of voting rules
Social Choice and Welfare | 2021-11-12 | Paper |
On the subgame perfect implementability of voting rules
Social Choice and Welfare | 2021-11-12 | Paper |
A solution to the two-person implementation problem
Journal of Economic Theory | 2021-05-11 | Paper |
Metrizable preferences over preferences
Social Choice and Welfare | 2020-12-29 | Paper |
POSITIVELY RESPONSIVE COLLECTIVE CHOICE RULES AND MAJORITY RULE: A GENERALIZATION OF MAY'S THEOREM TO MANY ALTERNATIVES
International Economic Review | 2020-01-29 | Paper |
Nash implementing social choice rules with restricted ranges
Review of Economic Design | 2019-08-13 | Paper |
Restricting the domain allows for weaker independence
Social Choice and Welfare | 2019-06-12 | Paper |
Absolute qualified majoritarianism: how does the threshold matter?
Economics Letters | 2018-09-11 | Paper |
Which dictatorial domains are superdictatorial? A complete characterization for the Gibbard-Satterthwaite impossibility
Mathematical Social Sciences | 2018-06-28 | Paper |
Evaluationwise strategy-proofness
Games and Economic Behavior | 2017-12-05 | Paper |
Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity
Mathematical Social Sciences | 2017-11-22 | Paper |
Approval as an intrinsic part of preference
Studies in Choice and Welfare | 2016-11-08 | Paper |
The basic approval voting game
Studies in Choice and Welfare | 2016-11-08 | Paper |
Hyper-stable social welfare functions
Social Choice and Welfare | 2016-03-01 | Paper |
Voting games of resolute social choice correspondences
Social Choice and Welfare | 2015-08-11 | Paper |
The Tiebout hypothesis under membership property rights
Theory and Decision | 2015-07-15 | Paper |
Social choice without the Pareto principle under weak independence
Social Choice and Welfare | 2015-01-09 | Paper |
Monotonicity properties and their adaptation to irresolute social choice rules
Social Choice and Welfare | 2014-05-16 | Paper |
On domains that admit well-behaved strategy-proof social choice functions
Journal of Economic Theory | 2014-04-23 | Paper |
On the alternating use of ``unanimity and ``surjectivity in the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem
Economics Letters | 2013-01-28 | Paper |
Maskin monotonic aggregation rules
Economics Letters | 2013-01-07 | Paper |
Nash implementation of the majority rule
Economics Letters | 2013-01-07 | Paper |
On the manipulability of voting rules: the case of \(4\) and \(5\) alternatives
Mathematical Social Sciences | 2012-09-11 | Paper |
Is abstention an escape from Arrow's theorem?
Social Choice and Welfare | 2011-05-11 | Paper |
One-way monotonicity as a form of strategy-proofness
International Journal of Game Theory | 2011-05-05 | Paper |
A new monotonicity condition for tournament solutions
Theory and Decision | 2010-10-14 | Paper |
A characterization of the Copeland solution
Economics Letters | 2010-07-20 | Paper |
Simple collective identity functions
Theory and Decision | 2010-03-26 | Paper |
Expected utility consistent extensions of preferences
Theory and Decision | 2009-11-04 | Paper |
Choosers as extension axioms
Theory and Decision | 2009-11-04 | Paper |
Characterizations of majoritarianism: a unified approach
Social Choice and Welfare | 2009-10-19 | Paper |
Sophisticated preference aggregation
Social Choice and Welfare | 2009-10-19 | Paper |
Stereotype formation as trait aggregation
Mathematical Social Sciences | 2009-10-15 | Paper |
A general impossibility result on strategy-proof social choice hyperfunctions
Games and Economic Behavior | 2009-07-15 | Paper |
| Voting systems that combine approval and preference | 2009-05-22 | Paper |
Strategy-proofness of the plurality rule over restricted domains
Economic Theory | 2009-04-27 | Paper |
Arrovian impossibilities in aggregating preferences over non-resolute outcomes
Social Choice and Welfare | 2008-05-14 | Paper |
Strategy-proof resolute social choice correspondences
Social Choice and Welfare | 2008-01-22 | Paper |
A characterization of superdictatorial domains for strategy-proof social choice functions
Mathematical Social Sciences | 2007-12-14 | Paper |
On combining implementable social choice rules
Games and Economic Behavior | 2007-09-21 | Paper |
Dictatorial domains in preference aggregation
Social Choice and Welfare | 2007-02-14 | Paper |
Equilibrium allocations of endowment-pretension games in public good economies
Review of Economic Design | 2007-01-24 | Paper |
Nash implementation via hyperfunctions
Social Choice and Welfare | 2006-10-25 | Paper |
Ensuring Pareto optimality by referendum voting
Social Choice and Welfare | 2006-10-24 | Paper |
Minimal monotonic extensions of scoring rules
Social Choice and Welfare | 2006-08-18 | Paper |
Nash implementing non-monotonic social choice rules by awards
Economic Theory | 2006-06-16 | Paper |
Implementing matching rules by type pretension mechanisms
Mathematical Social Sciences | 2005-10-27 | Paper |
Sets of alternatives as Condorcet winners
Social Choice and Welfare | 2005-10-19 | Paper |
Strong equilibrium outcomes of voting games are the generalized Condorcet winners
Social Choice and Welfare | 2005-02-11 | Paper |
Scoring rules cannot respect majority in choice and elimination simultaneously
Mathematical Social Sciences | 2003-04-02 | Paper |
Another characterization of the majority rule.
Economics Letters | 2002-07-15 | Paper |
