Characterizing best-worst voting systems in the scoring context
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2268897
DOI10.1007/s00355-009-0417-1zbMath1198.91066DBLPjournals/scw/Garcia-LaprestaMM10OpenAlexW2104257901WikidataQ57086461 ScholiaQ57086461MaRDI QIDQ2268897
Miguel Martínez-Panero, José Luis García-Lapresta, Anthony A. J. Marley
Publication date: 15 March 2010
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-009-0417-1
Related Items (9)
The socially acceptable scoring rule ⋮ Electoral competition under best-worst voting rules ⋮ Axiomatic characterisations of the basic best-worst rule ⋮ The scorix: a popular representation of votes revisited ⋮ Dis\&approval voting: a characterization ⋮ Social choice rules driven by propositional logic ⋮ What proportion of sincere voters guarantees efficiency? ⋮ Duplication in OWA-Generated Positional Aggregation Rules ⋮ Is majority consistency possible?
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Implementability via protective equilibria
- An axiomatic characterization of different majority concepts
- Positionalist voting functions
- Axioms for approval voting: Direct proof
- A characterization result for the plurality rule
- Characterizations of scoring methods for preference aggregation
- A note on scoring rules that respect majority in choice and elimination.
- Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best --- worst choices
- The inverse plurality rule-an axiomatization
- A simple characterization of plurality rule
- Une caractérisation du vote à la majorité simple
- A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
- Aggregation of Preferences with Variable Electorate
- A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision
This page was built for publication: Characterizing best-worst voting systems in the scoring context