A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties

DOI10.1007/S00355-016-1006-8zbMATH Open1392.91061arXiv1502.05888OpenAlexW3102950188MaRDI QIDQ2397659FDOQ2397659

Gabriella Pigozzi, Leendert van der Torre, Srdjan Vesic, Jérôme Lang, Marija Slavkovik

Publication date: 23 May 2017

Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The literature on judgment aggregation is moving from studying impossibility results regarding aggregation rules towards studying specific judgment aggregation rules. Here we give a structured list of most rules that have been proposed and studied recently in the literature, together with various properties of such rules. We first focus on the majority-preservation property, which generalizes Condorcet-consistency, and identify which of the rules satisfy it. We study the inclusion relationships that hold between the rules. Finally, we consider two forms of unanimity, monotonicity, homogeneity, and reinforcement, and we identify which of the rules satisfy these properties.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.05888

zbMATH Keywords

judgment aggregation rules

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A measure of distance between judgment sets
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach
• Complexity of Judgment Aggregation
• Scoring rules for judgment aggregation
• A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
• Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
• The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
• Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules
• Extending Condorcet's rule
• Majority rule in the absence of a majority
• Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
• A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation
• The Condorcet set: majority voting over interconnected propositions
• Advances in knowledge representation, logic programming, and abstract argumentation. Essays dedicated to Gerhard Brewka on the occasion of his 60th birthday
• Lifting integrity constraints in binary aggregation
• Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
• The median rule in judgement aggregation
• A Complete Conclusion-Based Procedure for Judgment Aggregation
• Judgment Aggregation Rules and Voting Rules
• Measuring Dissimilarity between Judgment Sets

Cited In (8)

• Parameterized Complexity Results for the Kemeny Rule in Judgment Aggregation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The median rule in judgement aggregation
• The Problem of Judgment Aggregation in the Framework of Boolean-Valued Models
• An Abstract Algebraic Logic View on Judgment Aggregation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation
• Collective combinatorial optimisation as judgment aggregation

This page was built for publication: A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2397659)