An indirect evolutionary justification of risk neutral bidding in fair division games
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A comparison of pricing rules for auctions and fair division games
- Amicable divorce: Dissolving a partnership with simple mechanisms
- Asymmetric price-benefits auctions
- Auctions, public tenders, and fair division games: An axiomatic approach
- Believing in correlated types in spite of independence: an indirect evolutionary analysis
- Dissolving a partnership (un)fairly
- Dissolving a Partnership Efficiently
- Ex-post regret heuristics under private values. I: Fixed and random matching
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players, Part III. The Basic Probability Distribution of the Game
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players Part II. Bayesian Equilibrium Points
- Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3835792 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 903638 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the dynamic foundation of evolutionary stability in continuous models.
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: An indirect evolutionary justification of risk neutral bidding in fair division games
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2021786)